Tag Archives: blackberry

BlackBerry is bringing stickers and a digital storefront to BBM

Following Facebook Messenger, Line, Kakako Talk and many other messaging apps, BlackBerry today announced that it’s finally bringing stickers to BlackBerry Messenger (BBM).

The feature will begin as a limited external beta, alongside a new area of the cross-platform messaging service called BBM Shop. Similar to its competitors, stickers will be separated into ‘packs’ around a specific character or theme.

BlackBerry will be promoting a set of original characters to begin with, called CosCat, Gilbert’s Tales, Bubble Bot, but it’s likely that roster will increase over time. Facebook and Path, among other apps with a messaging compontent, have offered characters from well-established brands such as LEGO, Peanuts and Despicable Me, to tempt users and their hard-earned cash. BlackBerry said it would do the same with characters from TV shows and movies, although it stopped short of giving examples or what the pricing structure would be.

The move isn’t original by any means, but it’ll make BlackBerry more competitive with some of its closest rivals. Given all of the attention bestowed upon Facebook and WhatsApp recently, BlackBerry needs to make sure that it doesn’t lose any traction of its own in the coming months.

While pricing wasn’t touched upon, stickers – especially branded packs – and the introduction of the BBM Shop suggests that BlackBerry is hoping this will become an important revenue stream for BBM.

Coming next to BBM: Stickers


From BYOB to WYOD: How Wearables Will Transform Business

Over the past few years, organizations worldwide were forced to deal with an IT “problem” referred to as BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). It started with smart phones, and now it’s occurring with other devices as well.

Here’s what happened: Most large organizations, as well as midsize and even smaller ones, required their people to have a Blackberry. By combining a cell phone with a secure, enterprise level email system, Blackberry changed how we use cell phones and took mobile working to a new level. Unlike the Blackberry, when the Apple iPhone came out, it transformed how we use our mobile phone by making it a handheld multimedia computer. As useful, inexpensive, and easy to install mobile apps took off, it didn’t take long for employees at all levels to discover the power of this transformative tool. It soon became common to see people with two phones: the Blackberry because they had to, and the iPhone because they wanted to. As soon as Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and a host of others got into the smart phone business, and the smart tablet business, BYOD became unstoppable.

Because of the rapid rise of the BYOD trend, the vast majority of companies found themselves reacting and putting out fires. Before BYOD, IT could control the use of technology. They’d issue the device and it would be locked down with the corporate IT firewall. But with more and more employees bringing in their own devices, IT’s efforts to keep a secure environment became almost impossible amongst the ever increasing number of devices they had little control over. In short, BYOD created a major IT problem, not just in the United States, but also in Europe and Asia.

Today, we have a new impending IT crisis, as well as an opportunity, that’s very predictable. Soon we will all be dealing with WYOD (Wear Your Own Device). Consider this: It’s estimated that one million wearable devices will ship by the end of 2014. It’s also estimated that there will be 300 million shipped by 2018, and I think that number will be far greater. That’s a lot of wearable devices. If people started bringing their own portable devices into the office and wrecking havoc on IT, you can bet it’s going to start happening with wearable technology, such as Google Glass, smart watches, and other types of computing devices you can wear, including the screenless smart phone I’ve written about in the past.

Therefore, I’m suggesting, from an organizational standpoint that includes business, government, and education, that everyone develop a WYOD strategy immediately—now—before the predictable problem hits. So instead of putting out fires like we did when the BYOD crisis hit, we can turn the impending WYOD crisis into an opportunity. So let’s develop guidelines right now and take what I call a “preactive” approach, which means we’re taking pre-action to a future known event.

To start looking at WYOD as an opportunity rather than a crisis, let’s start asking some new questions, such as: “How can we use smart watches with our sales team?” “How can we use Google Glass with all of our people who need to access data while standing up and moving around, like maintenance and customer service?” “How can we use the new wearable technologies to do things that we couldn’t do before, to increase productivity and efficiency?” “What wearable technology purchasing guidelines should we send to our employees?”

Wearable devices are here and they’ll only gain popularity as time goes on. Therefore, get ahead of the curve and harness the opportunities. As I always say, if it can be done, it will be done. The only question is, who will do it first? Now’s your chance to harness the opportunities before your competitors do.


DANIEL BURRUS is considered one of the world’s leading technology forecasters and innovation experts, and is the founder and CEO of Burrus Research, a research and consulting firm that monitors global advancements in technology driven trends to help clients understand how technological, social and business forces are converging to create enormous untapped opportunities. He is the author of six books including The New York Times best seller Flash Foresight.


BlackBerry sues Ryan Seacrest’s company over iPhone keyboard

By Alastair Sharp

TORONTO Fri Jan 3, 2014 3:54pm EST

Host Ryan Seacrest isseen during a commercial break at the Season 12 finale of ''American Idol'' in Los Angeles, Calfiornia May 16, 2013. REUTERS/Phil McCarten

Host Ryan Seacrest isseen during a commercial break at the Season 12 finale of ”American Idol” in Los Angeles, Calfiornia May 16, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Phil McCarten

(Reuters) – BlackBerry Ltd said on Friday it had filed a lawsuit against a company co-founded by “American Idol” host Ryan Seacrest that offers a physical keyboard that can be attached to some of Apple Inc’s touchscreen iPhone 5 models.

The company, Typo Products LLC, is currently taking pre-orders for the $99 keyboard, which features angled miniature keys similar to those used on many of BlackBerry’s devices.

Canada’s BlackBerry, a once dominant smartphone maker that has lost market share to the iPhone and other touchscreen devices, said Typo’s keyboard infringes its own design.

The allegation has not been proven in court. Typo and Seacrest could not immediately be reached to comment on the legal proceedings.

“We are flattered by the desire to graft our keyboard onto other smartphones, but we will not tolerate such activity without fair compensation for using our intellectual property and our technological innovations,” Steve Zipperstein, BlackBerry’s chief legal officer, said in a statement.

BlackBerry posted billions in losses in recent quarters as its latest devices sold poorly, but it has maintained a loyal niche of customers who prefer to type on a physical keyboard.

The BlackBerry complaint is case no. 3:14-cv-23 in the United States District Court for the northern district of California.

(Additional reporting by Euan Rocha; Editing by Jeffrey Hodgson and Gunna Dickson)

BlackBerry Files Lawsuit Against Seacrest’s Typo Keyboard Startup For Infringement

Next Story

BlackBerry has today filed a lawsuit against startup Typo Keyboards, which is backed by Ryan Seacrest. The company alleges that Typo copied BlackBerry’s patented and “iconic” keyboard design.

“We are flattered by the desire to graft our keyboard onto other smartphones, but we will not tolerate such activity without fair compensation for using our intellectual property and our technological innovations,” Steve Zipperstein, BlackBerry’s General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer, said in a statement today.

Seacrest invested $1M in the accessory, which encloses an iPhone in a case with a keyboard attached to the bottom half. The keyboard covers the iPhone’s home button but offers an alternate home button on the bottom right corner.

BlackBerry says that the Typo Keyboard violates its intellectual property rights, and that it will protect those rights from “blatant copying and infringement.”

“BlackBerry’s iconic physical keyboard designs have been recognized by the press and the public as a significant market differentiator for its mobile handheld devices,” the statement concludes.

The design certainly bears some resemblance a strong resemblance to BlackBerry’s signature rounded-corner keys and sloped corner design — right down to the placement of the back and return buttons. But one does have to wonder how many ways you can arrange keys on a keyboard.

Here’s the BlackBerry Q10 keyboard:

Screen Shot 2014-01-03 at 10.00.56 AM

And here’s the Typo keyboard accessory:

Screen Shot 2014-01-03 at 10.03.34 AM

Either way, BlackBerry’s death rattle is unlikely to be slowed by its new strategy of ‘get money from Seacrest‘.

Article title updated to clarify that BlackBerry is suing over design infringement, not features.


Why Leaving WhatsApp!

Top reasons to leave WhatsApp rightnow

2 years ago, I started using WhatsApp which helped me to be connected with my friends around. In fact, at this moment it was perfect and connect mobile users everywhere whatever the platform they use!

But lately, it seems violating your personal privacy is the biggest problem is;

Having my number, doesn’t mean “Hi I want to chat with you!”

It’s a true! Once anyone got your number, soon you’ll find a WhatsApp message saying;

“Hey there! I am here, Save my number. Huh!”

Unfortunately you can’t ignore this message because the second biggest problem is;

Last Seen at ….. O.o

It’s directly violating your personal privacy. Being online doesn’t mean that my friends/WhatsApp users in my contact list need to know my last time I’ve spended in WhatsApp! It’s enough to see that I’m online when I be!

It’s not only about the last seen message;

Anyone can see your status!!!

Even if you blocked someone, Just add your number at another friend contact list and hell yeah! I’m seeing your status! on another WhatsApp user.

And last but not least it is;

Wasting time

Because, you can’t ignore any messages due to last seen message. So, if you’re busy and just chatted with someone really need to chat with. Others will join the crowed and needed to be answered as well.

So, take a decision.

Written by

Co-founder/CEO of @Geeksday | MSP at Microsoft | Business Development & Marketing Specialist. | BlackBerry/Windows Phone developer | AIESECer | Geek

Published December 29, 2013


5 Things You Should Know About Mobile Before You Start Making Apps

Learnings about mobile from an agency perspective.


In the interest of full disclosure; I wrote this article as part of a yearly report on consumer trends and technological advancements in the mobile space. The report is an initiative of In the Pocket, the agency I work for.

A high-quality, multi-platform mobile project requires input from at least 7 specialists. Introducing the team:

  • an interaction design expert.
    People are unforgiving when it comes to interacting with apps or sites on their smartphone. If a user can’t immediately figure out how to use your product, he or she will move on without blinking.
  • a mobile designer.
    Designing for mobile is a specialty in its own right. Of course a mobile designer needs a keen eye for what works in small spaces. But they also need to know about the platforms that will carry their designs. They need to know about ninepatching (a scaling gimmick needed for Android’s fluid design) and about dealing with retina screens for example.
  • an iOS developer
    Don’t believe the stereotypes. Not all iOS developers are turtleneck-wearing, sneaker-sporting college dropouts. Some of them did finish college but the iOS development crowd has 1 thing in common: a passion for products that are both beautiful and technically excellent.
  • an Android developer
    Some people say developing for Android is easy. This is false, it’s just that there is a low treshold. Any middle-aged computer teacher with a notion of Java can publish an Android app but it takes a much rarer breed to make an app that works on all 12000 Android devices.
  • a web / backend developer
    The web is everywhere and very few projects can go without the services of a web developer. The performance of most every mobile app hinges on a well-thought-out, scalable backend and API.
  • a project manager
    Pragmatic, emphatic and thick-skinned, this is the all-rounder of the team. They filter, dispatch and push a project forward. Above all they are great communicators. They speak in the same way as they write; clearly and concisely.
  • a test engineer
    Owning the quality aspect of a digital product is easier said than done. It takes a special kind of personality to root out bugs by ploughing through test scripts on dozens of devices. They are worth their weight in gold however since these are the guys (unfortunately girls are rare in this particular field) that keep your app store page free of 1-star reviews.

Web or native is the wrong question.

A lot of ink has been spilled over the web vs native debate. This debate is often too simplistic. Of course it depends on the project but there are a lot more options to choose from.

A native app doesn’t have to be a 100% native. You’ll want a native navigation model for that snappy feel but nothing is to keep you from using web technology in certain views. If it’s done right, your users won’t be able to tell the difference.

Image representing Android as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

Even when there are reasons not to go native, you can’t simply choose web. Building a mobile site and building a responsive site are 2 very different things (a responsive website changes its layout depending on the user’s screen and provides all your content on all platforms, while a mobile website is context specific — it focuses on supporting core tasks relevant in a mobile context).

You might even consider a cross-platform technology like Phonegap (that is if robustness and user experience don’t matter to you); the point is that there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

Too many cooks spoil the soup.

In one mobile project many companies can get involved. Branding agencies, content creators, ad networks, backend developers,… However, the end result should always be one great app that’s easy and fun to use. Apps are not like websites: you can’t change or update them on the fly and users will actually rate your product. So you need to get it right from the start.

It is crucial to clearly define deliverables, timings and responsibilities. Once everyone’s involvement is discussed, the project should move to creation, headed by a small team focusing only on making a great app.

Apple works in mysterious ways. Android just works.

To protect its closed ecosystem, Apple has a mind of its own. If you submit an application you have to wait for approval. This can take days, but also weeks. If your app is rejected, you will have to adapt. Apple has guidelines, but they hold the right to change and interpret these guidelines to their advantage. There are absolutely no guarantees on Apple’s part and that can be frustrating.The bright side of this story is that this controlling attitude does safeguard the quality and the security of iOS applications which in its turn makes it easier to distribute and monetize your mobile apps.

Android is open and free. Upload your app and see it go live for more than a billion devices. This freedom makes Google Play a bit like the internet: you’ll find some of the most innovative and compelling stuff on there, but also thousands of products that were made by amateurs for no apparent reason.

Mobile moves fast. So should you.

The only reason that the companies producing consumer goods got to coin the term “fast-moving”, is because the mobile industry didn’t exist at the time.

The iPhone is barely 6 years old. In its wake, companies have come and gone (Nokia and Blackberry seem to be on their way out while Rovio and Instagram have made mobile history). Entire industries have already been disrupted by mobile (gaming, media, publishing) while others are about to be rattled (education, health, payments…).

At a lower level, things move equally fast. Look under the hood of all mobile software and you will find complex machinery comprising 3rd party API’s, SDK’s, libraries and other components, ever-updating according to their own development life cycle. With all these technologies evolving at a breakneck pace, it is necessary to follow suit.

Even during the creation of an application, mobile is changing.Take a pragmatic approach and allow the product to pivot and adapt when new opportunity presents itself.

The full report is available here.


Further Reading

Disruption and Opportunity


How Mobile is Changing your Business

Mobile in 2014, what to expect


Jeroen Lemaire is co-founder and managing director of In the Pocket, a leading mobile agency in Europe.



Written by

self-confessed geek, all-round mobile & web aficionado and operations guy at In The Pocket. Opinions are my own.



Brands and Advertisers need to care about wearable tech

Simple steps for the post-screen world


In 2000 Jack Dorsey started using a RIM 850, an early BlackBerry mobile phone. Inspired by the ability to check email on the go, Dorsey built STAT.US, a program that allowed users to share short messages with their friends.

No one cared.

In a recent New Yorker profile, Dorsey attributes the poor reception to no one else having a BlackBerry. But imagine the benefit to brands had they foreseen the cultural revolution Dorsey created with Twitter six years later. It’s still in its infancy, but brands have that opportunity now with wearable tech.

So far, Nike, Jawbone, and Fitbit have focused in on fitness while Samsung, Google, Pebble and others are creative smartphone-like experiences on another (much smaller) screen. Analysts’ predictions on eventual market size vary. IHS Research puts it at $6 Billion by 2016 while Credit Suisse forecasts $50 Billion in the next 3 to 5 years.

The fast pace of development so far, combined with analysts’ predictions, warrant attention from advertisers now. If wearable tech succeeds in the way some predict, the impact on consumer mobile habits will be exponential.

Wearable tech will disrupt mobile.

The US has more cellphones than people and more than one third own a tablet. Mobile penetration is high, and brands that understand mobile have formed an unparalleled intimacy with their customers.

But consumer mobile habits are changing. Phones are getting larger and tablets are getting smaller. There’s a limited difference between phones like the Samsung Galaxy Note III and the new iPad mini. Consumers might turn to a phablet + wearable tech solution, abandoning separate phones and tablets.

Wearable tech gives brands an even closer connection to their customers. It’s not just where they are, but now how they move. But as consumers move to wearable tech there’s no guarantee the culture of app development that exists on mobile and tablets will survive. Some brands could be locked out.

Advertising will become post-screen.

Advertisers love to talk about screens: mobile, tablet, TV, desktop, and game console. Wearable tech will be another possible consumer touch point, but the technology won’t necessarily follow a screen paradigm.

Wearable tech’s value proposition is routed in consumers receiving utility in exchange for sharing additional details. I let Nike see how much I move in exchange for tracking my fitness; not to sell me shoes.

For brands to find their way on wearable tech, the way they communicate with their customers must change. Consumers won’t interact with mobile display ads or branded apps on a 1-inch screen. The value exchange will become utility in return for sharing context.

Apps that exist for the brand and not for the customer will be left behind.

Image representing Jack Dorsey as depicted in ...
Image via CrunchBase

Consumers are already becoming more selective with the apps that they engage with. In a recent presentation I saw by AOL Digital Prophet David Shing, he discussed how the average is 41 apps on a phone, with only five being used regularly. With wearable tech, if an app is rubbish it won’t even get downloaded.

What brands can do now.

All that said, I don’t think brands shouldn’t be jumping on the wearable tech bandwagon yet. Similar to Dorsey’s STAT.US in 2000, the market size is still too small.

But brands do have the opportunity to improve how they leverage consumer data to add utility and value. When consumers adopt wearable tech they will look to brands they trust. Imagine the business benefit to being ahead of this curve.


Further Reading

Loyalty marketing, wearable tech, and milkshake moments


Marketing strategy lessons from Walgreens



Written by

marketing insights & strategy. closet foodie. horrible uke player. views are my own.




Co-founder Lazaridis cuts stake in BlackBerry

Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:41pm EST

  • inShare4
  • Share this
  • Email
  • Print
Mike Lazaridis, President and Co-CEO of Research In Motion, speaks during BlackBerry's DevCon at the Moscone West Center in San Francisco, California, October 18, 2011. REUTERS/Beck Diefenbach

Mike Lazaridis, President and Co-CEO of Research In Motion, speaks during BlackBerry’s DevCon at the Moscone West Center in San Francisco, California, October 18, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Beck Diefenbach

(Reuters) – BlackBerry Ltd co-founder Mike Lazaridis cut his stake in the company to 4.99 percent from 8 percent, and said that a group, which included Lazaridis, walked away from exploring a bid for the troubled smartphone maker. (link.reuters.com/sup65v)

Co-founders Lazaridis and Douglas Fregin in October disclosed in a regulatory filing they were considering a bid to buy the company.

BlackBerry abandoned its plan to sell itself last month after a two-month review of strategic options and talks with potential buyers that included Facebook, Lenovo and private equity firms such as Cerberus Capital.

(Reporting By Narottam Medhora in Bangalore; Editing by Maju Samuel)


Two Years without an iPhone

Three things I’ll never be again after my hiatus from the hyper-modern world



After my iPhone was stolen two years ago, I decided to punish myself. I walked indignantly into my nearest AT&T store looking to purchase “the cheapest phone you have.”


My original dumbphone was alright. I successfully called and interviewed the founder of Path with it. Then I got lost in Yosemite for 48 hours and decided that I should invest in a more reliable texting apparatus, perhaps with a built-in GPS. But I wasn’t ready for an actual smartphone just yet. There was a certain exhilaration I experienced being purposefully unavailable to the entire world at all times.


My second dumbphone came with touchscreen technology. Yet, I was still an antiquated member of society. My friends chastised me (“Do you even have apps?”), and my boyfriend gave me an iPod for Christmas to make my digital alienation more bearable for him. Ultimately, we survived.


Two years later, I’m ready to grow up, bind myself to a non-negotiable cellular contract and join a world perpetually frustrated at the inefficiencies of being tied to an imperfect machine yet unwilling to fathom a life severed from it.


The first few weeks with my new HTC One I felt savvy and efficient. I sent more work emails, texted more with my friends and took more photos than I ever had before. I even went insofar as to set up my voicemail. I’m more connected than I have been in the last two years, but not nearly as aware as I was while on hiatus from the hyper-modern world. Now, with my brand new smartphone, I look back at the three things I’ll never be again.


Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase


read more -> https://medium.com/adventures-in-consumer-technology/ff727a079745




Fairfax struggles to raise funds for BlackBerry bid: sources

A Blackberry logo is seen at the Blackberry campus in Waterloo

(Reuters) – Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd is struggling to raise financing for its $4.7 billion bid for BlackBerry Ltd, with several large banks declining to participate on concerns that the smartphone maker will not be able to reverse its fortunes, according to people familiar with the matter.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/01/us-blackberry-fairfax-idUSBRE9A011X20131101